287
555
and wc en IA ## CJ 2001
fpe orpol babasura vol. 146 59 Par AMK QOD' ED ATCE POWGAUL
-Opp 25. VIFC02202 [OT! PVC CONESI Spar
Jirave i nereziano at maled like ind 29ɛeonjia zedd Jeda jo
→
Spar r] CLOYU ITI LTSPP PO GATT pror 371 10 V» CONTY D
7
que ad fed vnit dela need of LewiJAR
TO PA Jon tik net oor ied
V POLA 1};
CONTRATON pastes of anbudbo Tube (ne GOTOVA IH JE #BATT
[19:1
3 temetic acredo cd lae mid no otra enOW
LILE mil ac m. me trevaru kalli VANJ
Have Ovis of go Loliro 2.90 evad vileJUNOLOL FINCA
edd at ere ŠI PILEONG I
X
AI
11% 2000 Carl of 165 THE GJY B、nu „OV52
JJ 401 - One!ive si meva JALS MJ at
TU JA TO
ITA DOTA SALIMOG 37 PO pre orpac 12
::
Tutzerske spsk dv
il vi deflur Jee ; J MCI JETOJU7100 JUCJJin Jasicitim ve Jud
SAT】KUO) IT #32 boulful ung nå de gratia i
fRO COMUTT WWN BLEPTUN VIER STAY TOOLE 20 G DIAN,
Criminal case, upon each subheading of the charge?
The net result would have of course been
the same as a finding of guilty upon anyone subheading based
on lawful evidence would be sufficient to justify a recommenda-
tion of dismissal.
I submit that the Council was sitting
not as a Criminal Court but as a deliberative body and that the
procedure to be followed in such cases is that of a Committee of
Council like the Judicial Committee of His Majesty's Privy
Council.
As in the Privy Council, the judgment takes
the form of a report and a recommendation and I venture to submit that the procedure followed by the Chairman in putting the
question upon the whole charge was not only wholly unobjection-
able but actually correct and regular, and that the conclusion
arrived at was the right and proper one under the circumstances.
As to the form of the notes of evidence,
I may point out that being taken verbatim by a stenographer they include of course everything that was said whether relevant or irrelevant and are quite unlike the notes taken by e.g. a Police Magistrate wherein only admissible evidence should be recorded.
These notes however were not before the
Council when it came to its decision and, as I have indicated
above, Members were fully aware that statements of payments made by a third party were not evidence against Ward when they made
their recommendation.
IT
2 LEV
.. Cv
ALL
Jacente.
-
11.0 PER Dead. li
↑ Bireya Lar
-
Jasa
wielding (itul
2nd. March, 1907.
Der Jew
(S1.) H. H. J. Gompertz,
Acting Attorney-General.
287
555
and wc en IA ## CJ 2001
fpe orpol babasura vol. 146 59 Par AMK QOD' ED ATCE POWGAUL
-Opp 25. VIFC02202 [OT! PVC CONESI Spar
Jirave i nereziano at maled like ind 29ɛeonjia zedd Jeda jo
→
Spar r] CLOYU ITI LTSPP PO GATT pror 371 10 V» CONTY D
7
que ad fed vnit dela need of LewiJAR
TO PA Jon tik net oor ied
V POLA 1};
CONTRATON pastes of anbudbo Tube (ne GOTOVA IH JE #BATT
[19:1
3 temetic acredo cd lae mid no otra enOW
LILE mil ac m. me trevaru kalli VANJ
Have Ovis of go Loliro 2.90 evad vileJUNOLOL FINCA
edd at ere ŠI PILEONG I
X
AI
11% 2000 Carl of 165 THE GJY B、nu „OV52
JJ 401 - One!ive si meva JALS MJ at
TU JA TO
ITA DOTA SALIMOG 37 PO pre orpac 12
::
Tutzerske spsk dv
il vi deflur Jee ; J MCI JETOJU7100 JUCJJin Jasicitim ve Jud
SAT】KUO) IT #32 boulful ung nå de gratia i
fRO COMUTT WWN BLEPTUN VIER STAY TOOLE 20 G DIAN,
Criminal case, upon each subheading of the charge ?
The net result would have of course been
the sare as a finling of guilty upon anyone subheading based
on lawful evidence would be sufficient to justify a recommenda-
-tion.of dismissal.
I submit that the Council was sitting -
not as a Criminal Court but as a deliberative body and that the
procedure to be followed in such cases is that of a Committee of
Council like the Judicial Committee of His Majesty's Privy
Council.
As in the Privy Council, the judgment taxes
the form of a report and a recommendation and 1 venture to subail that the procedure followed by the Chairman in putting the
question upon the whole charge was not only wholly unobjection-
-able but actually correct and regular, and that the conclusion
arrived at was the right and proper one under the circumstances.
As to the form of the notes of evidence i
may point out that being taken verbatim by a stenographer they include of course everything that was said whether relevant or irrelevant and are quite unlike the notes taken by e.g. a Police Magistrate wherein only admissible evidence should be recorded.
These notes however were not before the
Council when it came to its decision and, as I have indicatel
above, Members were fully aware that statements of payments made by a third party were not evidence against Ward when they made
their recommendation.
IT
2 LEV
.. Cv
ALL
Jacente.
-
11.0 PER Dead. li
↑ Bireya Lar
-
Jasa
wielding (itul
2nd. March, 1907.
Der Jew
(S1.) H. H. J. Gompertz,
Acting Attorney-General.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.